Kutak Rock LLP is ISO 27001:2013 certified. 1994-2023 Kutak Rock LLP. All rights reserved.

What services does the firm offer? How do I search for attorneys? Where are the firm's offices?
Home/ People/ Todd J. Guerrero

Todd J. Guerrero

Partner

Energy
Minneapolis P: 612.334.5007 F: 612.334.5050

As chair of the firm’s energy group, Todd brings together the firm’s deep experience on energy and related infrastructure matters to help clients efficiently meet their business objectives.

  • J.D., William Mitchell College of Law
  • B.A., St. John's University
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
  • Supreme Court of Minnesota
  • Minnesota
  • American Bar Association (Business Law Section)
  • American Bar Association (Environmental, Natural Resources and Energy Section)
  • Minnesota State Bar Association (Public Utilities Section)
  • Minnesota Hispanic Bar Association

Todd brings more than 25 years of experience in the energy sector to assist clients in a range of business and regulatory matters within both the renewable and traditional energy industries, including project development, power purchase agreements, engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) agreements, large energy facility permitting, contested cases and appeals. Todd has assisted clients develop hundreds of megawatts of solar energy facilities in the last few years alone.
Recent Briefs
  • Pre-Hearing Comments of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, October 4, 2017, In re: Appeal by LADWP re RPS Eligibility, California Energy Commission, Docket No. 16-RPS-02.
  • State Minnesota Court of Appeals, No. A17-0099. In re Order Approving the Application by DG Minnesota, LLC for Conditional Use Permit, Brief of DG Minnesota, SG2, LLC.
  • State of Minnesota Court of Appeals, No. A14-2176. In re Application of EOF Investments, LLC, Brief of Addendum of Relators.
  • State of Minnesota Court of Appeals, No. A14-2176. In re Application of EOF Investments, LLC, Reply Brief and Addendum of Relators.
  • State of Minnesota Court of Appeals, No. A14-1777. Ruby Red Denata, LLC (Appellants) v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota (Respondent), Brief and Addendum of Appellants.
  • State of Minnesota Court of Appeals, Nos. A14-1176 and A14-1177. 110 Wyman, LLC, et al. (Appellants (No. A-1176)) Ruby Red Denata, LLC, et al. (Appellants (No. A14-1177)) v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota (Respondent), Reply Brief and Addendum of Appellants.
  • State of Minnesota Court of Appeals, Nos. A14-0438 and A14-0439 In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of the Acquisition of 600 MW of Wind Generation, and In the Matter of Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of the Acquisition of 150 MW of Wind Generation, Brief and Addendum of Relators-Appellants.
Presentations
  • “The End of Fees Disguised as Taxes,” City of St. Paul Pilot Committee Meeting, June 1, 2017 (speaker)
  • “Nonprofit Real Property and Tax Exemption – The End of Fees Disguised as Taxes,” 2017 Nonprofit Law Conference, March 14, 2017 (speaker)

  • Lead counsel, 80-MW solar facility (Alabama) - PPA development
  • Lead counsel, 50-MW solar facility (Florida) - PPA, development
  • Lead counsel, 35-MW solar facility (Maryland) - PPA, development
  • Lead counsel, 30-MW solar facility (Maryland) - PPA, development
  • Lead counsel, purchase of 48-MW of solar projects (Florida)
  • Lead counsel, permitting of 25-MW of solar - (Minnesota)
  • Lead regulatory counsel, 350-MW windfarm (Nebraska)
  • Lead regulatory counsel, consortium of solar developers in settlement before public utilities commission
  • Lead counsel, 80-MW solar facility (Alabama) - PPA, development
  • Lead counsel, 52-MW solar facility (Mississippi) - PPA, development
  • Lead counsel, 52-MW solar facility (Mississippi) - PPA, development
  • Lead counsel, contested case, 78-MW wind farm (Minnesota)
  • Sale of 120-MW wind farm
  • 140-MW wind project - project lead
  • 400-MW wind project - project lead
  • Lead counsel, 500-MW, $1.6 billion supercritical pulverized coal plant and transmission lines
  • Lead outside counsel in first successful advanced prudence determination, North Dakota Public Service Commission

{{tag.label}}

We use cookies on our website. To learn more about cookies, how we use them and how to revise your cookie settings, please see our terms of use. By continuing to use this site you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
VIEW STATEMENT