Insurance Litigation, Management and Supervision

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • News
  • Publications
  • Events
July 10, 2015
On July 9, 2015 the Arizona Supreme Court issued its opinion in Wilks v. Manobianco. The issue in the case was whether an insurance agent’s compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 20-259.01, which requires insurers to offer uninsured motorist (UM) and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage to insureds, precluded a negligence claim against the agent for failure to procure the UIM coverage requested by the insured which the agent agreed to procure. For more information, please read our client alert.
Client Alert